Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc.
Positively the principle may be expressed as in matters of intellect, do not pretend conclusions are certain that are not demonstrated or demonstrable.'"And that is basically it.One thing I have witnessed more than once, first hand: Spend enough time with the people you describe, and the difference will become rivetingly clear.If you cross certain lines of any person's belief system, what ever that system is, they will let you know in no uncertain terms.If you non practice, you clearly dont take the dogma seriously. The "I dont know" definition is a very simplistic approach to a moderately complex set of ideas, and is more often than not misapplied, in context, as a word.For the relatively few who understand and identify with this set of ideas, to the point were they feel they need to describe themselves and their world view as agnostic, the term is used in the following context: The distinction an agnostic makes is in the denunciation of the (commonly held) concept/view that the system of belief/disbelief is a valid process of reasoning or an appropriate/rational means by which one can approach any examination of reality/existence, either of its constituant part or in it's entirety.To come to a more intricate understanding of what I am describing here, it is necessary to examine the etymology of the word, and thus make an epistemological evaluation. Gnosis: Wiki:"The word "Gnosticism" is a modern construction, though based on an antiquated linguistic expression: it comes from the Greek word meaning "knowledge", gnosis (??? Unlike modern English, ancient Greek was capable of discerning between several different forms of knowing. Indeed, in most Gnostic systems the sufficient cause of salvation is this "knowledge of" ("acquaintance with") the divine.These different forms may be described in English as being propositional knowledge, indicative of knowledge acquired indirectly through the reports of others or otherwise by inference (such as "I know of George Bush" or "I know Berlin is in Germany"), and empirical knowledge acquired by direct participation or acquaintance (such as "I know George Bush personally" or "I know Berlin, having visited"). This is commonly identified with a process of inward "knowing" or self-exploration, comparable to that encouraged by Plotinus (c. This is what helps separate Gnosticism from proto-orthodox views, where the orthodox views are considered to be superficial. The inadequate take then requires a correct form of interpretation.Some agnostics do take this stance, but there are others (like myself) who assert, that though it is not possible to prove/disprove god at the moment, it may be possibly to do so sometime in the future.as well, the statement, "grounds to justify the belief" is completely false.However, as may be seen, the term "gnostic" also had precedent usage in several ancient philosophical traditions, which must also be weighed in considering the very subtle implications of its appellation to a set of ancient religious groups."As you can see, gnosis refers to what we would term in English as belief, faith, or subjective reasoning without regard to the objective counterpart.Agnosticism: the most important thing to consider when taking this word into account is the Latin prefix "A" which can be roughly translated to English as "not" "cannot" or "without".